Saturday, April 29, 2006

Back to the Drawing Board

It is the end of an Invasion here: At the end of this school year, we will be returning to Germany to live there. However, I doubt that this will mark the end of this blog; at most it will mark the founding of a new name. :-) Either way, we Germans still stand strong, and will continue sending posts of Politics and Photos. Who knows, many years later the invasion may return. Until I can speak German again, I, and my fellow Bloggers, I hope, will continue writing in English, and then we might go to translations, twice the posts. ;-) Also, more talk of German and European politics will no doubt be posted, but we'll try to put in the occasional post about the United States and Canada. Finally, depending on what computers we have in Germany, Dollars may become Euros, so in case this happens, a salute to money: $9,927,000,000 and $2,250,000,000, the aid donations of, respectively: The United States and Canada, 1999, with Germany in between at $6,818,000,000. (Information from Millennium(r) World Atlas, published by Rand McNally, www.randmcnally.com) for 2005 the charts say $27,457,000,000 USA, $9,915,000,000 Germany, and still in last: $3,731,000,000 Canada. These statistics, the most updated ones I could find, come from http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Debt/USAid.asp I may have read either of these charts wrong, but those are their numbers, and that's my tribute to dollars. :-)

A Note from tvhtoo: I beg to differ with my distinguished friend as to the state of our invasion. Since I consider it an invasion of the blogosphere (a slow invasion, for now), this invasion can and will only end when the blog is deleted. Its success is another matter. ;)

On a different note, I, like Gnomey, look forward to multilingual posts and to a new life in Germany. Unless I am gravely mistaken, the universities there are free for citizens like me. Excelente!

Colbert's Shady Past

Colbert's Shady Past

Just having a bit of fun with Adobe Photoshop. :o)

The bear photo (including the background) is Charles Glatzer's. It is available here. The photo of Colbert is from this site under Jan. 13, 2006.

Finally, here's a link to Colbert Nation, the "#1 Colbert Report Fan Site."

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Our Official Mascot

Voilà!

Tortoise Drawing

A non-threatening mascot for a non-threatening blog. :o)

Flower Post

I have been taking more photos with my brother's digital camera. What follows is a selection.

First, two photos of odd-looking flowers on a laurel bush by our driveway:

Laurel Flowers

Bee on Laurel

Second, a close-up of a hyacinth:

Hyacinth Close-up

Third, some quince flowers:

Quince Flowers

And, finally, photos of the rhododendron bush in our garden:

Rhododendrons

Monday, April 24, 2006

The Armenian Genocide

Today is Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day. According to this site, it is on April 24, ninety-one years ago, that "300 Armenian leaders, writers, thinkers and professionals in Constantinople (present day Istanbul) were rounded up, deported and killed." The same day, in Constantinople, "5,000 of the poorest Armenians were butchered in the streets and in their homes."

The murder of approximately 1.5 million Armenians between 1915 and 1917 is not officially recognized as genocide by countries like the United Kingdom, the United States, Israel, Georgia and the Ukraine. It is, however, generally accepted that systematic killing, based on ethnicity, was involved. Most official waverings seem to be prompted by politics, not by legitimate doubt as to the facts.

I was looking for information about various countries' stances on the Armenian Genocide, and came across these two quotations. The first is from this site.
"Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres has claimed in the past that Israel does not officially recognize the Armenian Genocide 'out of concern for the unique place of the Holocaust in the chronicles of human history.'" (March 8, 2002)
The article goes on to show that most Israelis and many Israeli scholars disagree with Peres's view. Needless to say, I disagree with his view, too. In fact, I was rather shocked to read such words from a Nobel Peace Prize winner. Not only is Peres's assertion false (most agree that Israel's actions in this regard are a result of its political ties to Turkey), but it also undermines the lessons of the Holocaust. If we do not recognize the seriousness of offenses like the Armenian Genocide, we will not properly call to account the governments who are responsible. Furthermore, people will not pay enough attention to the issue; they will not recognize that it is an ongoing problem, nor will they be as likely to be vigilant and prevent similar events from occurring.

The second quotation came from this site.
"[. . .] during a news conference [April 19, 2006] in southern Manitoba, Prime Minister Harper affirmed his belief that the Armenians who died [between 1915 and 1920] were in fact, subjects of a genocide.

Turkey's ambassador to Canada thinks the decision goes too far.

'Your own citizens of Turkish origin, they are proud Canadians as much as you are,' said Aydemir Erman. 'So your own House is branding them as the grandchildren of killers.'"
Erman seems to have missed the point entirely. Official recognition isn't about Canadians of Turkish origin; it is about the Armenians who have suffered because of the genocide and subsequent denials. It is about showing that one doesn't get away with crimes against humanity, that people will not be left to suffer quietly, and that countries of the world won't allow these events to fade away into obscurity. None of this is done with an intent to shame Turks for all eternity. Official recognition is intended, at least in part, as a form of prevention and justice.

In any case, I sincerely believe that, if I were a Turk, I would be more concerned about my government's bullying of individuals and countries, and my government's attempts to hide the truth, than I would be about possibly being a descendant of killers. I can't help the past, but I can help the present and future.

Thursday, April 20, 2006

Lafeing Crokodil

Yesterday and the day before, I spent many hours sorting through old papers from my years at elementary school. The idea was to choose which papers to keep and which to throw away. I ended up throwing away most of the things, but there is also a decent pile of things I kept. Among those things are these two journal entries, presumably from when I was in grade one.

Lafeing Crokodil

Leaf-eating Meat Eater

There were at least two other journals. In one, I used the phrase "it was fun" at least a dozen times, and, inexplicably, wrote three or four entries about the Easter bunny in January. Quoth my teacher: "The Easter bunny is early."

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

Leaping over the Tennis Net

Yesterday, my brothers and I went to a nearby school to play tennis. That is, they went to play tennis; I rollerbladed a bit, then tried to take photos in the gathering dusk. Needless to say, I wasn't particularly successful. Here is a photo of my brother, though, that I find interesting:

Leaping over the Tennis Net

The quality of the photo is terrible, but I like how my brother appears to be hovering several inches over the tennis net.

More photos of my brother jumping over the net (sorry about the blurriness).

Leaping (strip)

I went to the school again today with my sister and took some more photos, so a selection will probably follow (eventually).

Saturday, April 15, 2006

Arctic Sovereignty

I recently read a CNN article about Arctic sovereignty. Before reading it, I was inclined to consider the whole idea ridiculous. Now, however, the Conservative government's position seems more understandable. Here are two excerpts from the article:
"Canadian forces on Sunday wrapped up a two-week exercise designed to assert sovereignty over the Arctic at a time when climate change is fueling international interest in the desolate, mineral-rich region.

"Five patrol groups started off at separate points in the west and central Arctic and traveled a total of 2,800 miles (4,500 kilometers) by snowmobile over snow and jagged sea ice through a region that is almost totally uninhabited."
"Canada is embroiled in territorial disputes with the United States over the Beaufort Sea in the Arctic — the site of deposits of natural gas — as well as with Denmark over which country owns Hans Island off the coast of Greenland.

"Ottawa is also sparring with Russia as to how far its control stretches up to the North Pole. The result could be worth billions of dollars in oil and gas revenue.

"The rapid pace of climate change means the usually ice-clogged Northwest Passage — a shortcut through the Arctic between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans — could be free of ice in summer by the end of the century.

"Canada claims ownership of the waters in the passage and says it does not want to see foreign ships using it at will, believing this could increase the chances of a disaster in an environmentally fragile region. The United States and others reject the claim."
I had not realized that natural resources, and billions of dollars, were at stake. Still, I wonder whether this issue could be more cheaply, more effectively, and more safely resolved through negotiations. Admittedly, negotiations alone don't seem particularly promising considering the (ongoing?) softwood lumber dispute. In that respect, a military presence in the Arctic might help by showing that the Canadian government is serious about its claims. I do have concerns that the resources, and Prime Minister Stephen Harper's handling of the matter, might lead to serious conflict, but perhaps that is unreasonable of me. Surely civilized countries like Canada, the US, Russia, etc. can resolve disputes in a peaceful and mature fashion. :o)

Mind you, the Hans Island affair didn't indicate much maturity. Admittedly, there was some justification for the countries' interest in the matter (the island is in the middle of a potential shipping line, and "standing firm" over Hans Island might help Canada in more serious disputes). Nonetheless, I think it's stupid to squabble over the little 1.3 square km piece of land. Frankly, I am not convinced that the island is significant, nor do I understand why Denmark and Canada can't have joint ownership, or why one or the other (preferably both) can't be gracious.

Anyway, Harper's Arctic plans (from his speech last December) include:
  • Stationing three new armed naval heavy ice breakers in the area of Iqaluit which will include 500 regular force personnel for crews and support;
  • Building a new military/civilian deep-water docking facility in the Iqaluit area;
  • Establishing a new Arctic National Sensor System for northern waters which will include underwater surveillance technologies;
  • Building a new Arctic army training centre in the area of Cambridge Bay on the Northwest Passage staffed by an estimated 100 regular force personnel;
  • Stationing new fixed-wing search-and-rescue aircraft in Yellowknife;
  • Providing eastern and western Arctic air surveillance through stationing new long range uninhabited aerial vehicle (UAV) squadrons at CFB Goose Bay and CFB Comox;
  • Revitalizing the Canadian Rangers by recruiting up to 500 additional Rangers increasing their level of training, activity, and equipment; and
  • Providing an army emergency response capability through the new airborne battalion and airlift capacity stationed at CFB Trenton to provide a rapid emergency response capability throughout the entire Arctic region.
It seems that the above plans are still in the early stages. From the CNN article:
"the patrol groups totaled only around 50 people on snowmobiles pulling wooden sleds"
Ha ha ha ha!

American Companies in China

I recently saw a documentary on TV about the Tiananmen Square massacre and internet censorship in China.

One thing that surprised me was how companies like Yahoo, Google, Cisco Systems, and Microsoft have facilitated censorship and monitoring of internet activity in China. In a way, this is old news; the Congressional hearing about the companies' actions was in mid-February. Still, it seems like something people should know (if they don't already).

What follows is some information about the matter.

First, from this site, some of the actions that have led to the criticism of the four companies:
  • "Cisco sells routers with censorship capability built into them, but the same technology is necessary to protect computer networks from viruses. It remains unclear exactly how much training and service Cisco knowingly provides to Chinese customers whose primary intent is to censor political speech. But meanwhile, it does acknowledge selling surveillance technologies directly to the Chinese Public Security Bureau and other law-enforcement bodies in a country where law enforcement is well documented to commit rampant human rights abuses. Cisco's excuse? Selling communications technology to these organizations is not against US law."

  • "Microsoft provides instant messaging and Hotmail (hosted on servers outside China so it doesn't have to hand over data), as well as a Chinese version of MSN Spaces, which it censors in accordance with Chinese government requirements. So when Chinese blogger Zhao Jing wrote in support of fired newspaper editors in December, his blog got deleted. Now MSN has refined its censorship so that censored blogs only get blocked to Internet users inside China, while people in the rest of the world can still access the sites."

  • "Yahoo! has a Chinese-language portal hosted inside China, with a search engine that filters out all websites and keywords deemed unacceptable by Chinese authorities. It does not inform users that the content is being censored in any way. Yahoo! also offers a Chinese-language e-mail service hosted on computer servers inside the People's Republic. Because the user data is under Chinese legal jurisdiction, Yahoo! is obligated to comply with Chinese police requests to hand over information. Such compliance over the past several years has led to the jailing of at least three dissidents."

  • "Google in January rolled out a new censored search engine, Google.cn. Some Chinese bloggers have mockingly called it the 'eunuch' or 'neutered' Google. However, Google executives point out that the site notifies users that their search results are censored, and that the uncensored Google.com remains accessible to Chinese. They also say they have decided not to provide Chinese e-mail or blog-hosting services in order to avoid putting themselves in the position that Yahoo! and Microsoft have found themselves in."
The companies have argued, among other things, that:
  • some internet access is better than no internet access
  • the companies don't have the authority or the power to influence Chinese government policy
  • the companies only provide the technology — it is the Chinese government that chooses to misuse it
An excerpt from a New York Times article, dated April 12:
"Google's chief executive, Eric E. Schmidt, whose company has been sharply criticized for complying with Chinese censorship, said on Wednesday that the company had not lobbied to change the censorship laws and, for now, had no plans to do so.

"'I think it's arrogant for us to walk into a country where we are just beginning operations and tell that country how to run itself,' Mr. Schmidt told reporters from foreign news organizations."
I wonder why Yahoo doesn't — like Microsoft — use servers outside China to avoid being in a position where it has to comply with unjust local laws. Handing over information that can lead to arrests of dissidents is surely much worse than censoring information (especially when users are informed that censorship is taking place).

In any case, whereas I do agree that some internet access is better than none, I am not convinced that any of the companies are doing their utmost to protect the rights of Chinese citizens. Quite the contrary, in fact, in some cases.

By the way, the Congressional hearing is available for viewing here under February 15.

Friday, April 07, 2006

US-India Nuclear Deal

I was going to discuss other cases of nuclear cooperation (or lack thereof) as well, but I think that, for now, I will stick to the controversial agreement between the US and India. To put it briefly, the US Senate has been debating whether or not to ratify an agreement that would allow India access to American civil nuclear technology.

There is widespread objection to the idea for several reasons.

To begin with, India has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Many people believe that it is irresponsible to provide nuclear technology of any kind to a country that does not, apparently, support nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament. Not only does such an agreement undermine the NPT; it also means that the US may be unintentionally setting the stage for more dangerous conflict (within Asia or otherwise). India is not, after all, subject to the searches and monitoring that apply to signatories of the NPT.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice defended her government's decision by saying that "past non-proliferation policies had not worked and that India was unlikely ever to sign up to the NPT." Accordingly, the deal would end "India's isolation from international nuclear standards." That may be, but one could return — as many have — that the US government should, at least, have managed to make a better deal (with more safeguards and more concessions on the Indian side).

It is difficult for me, personally, to judge the deal without more knowledge of specific conditions. For all I know, it may not be so bad. After all, Rice did say that "the agreement has been welcomed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Britain, France and Russia," and that "'civil nuclear co-operation with India will not lead to an arms race in South Asia.'"

Still, there are concerns. For example, the Indian government will, admittedly, make fourteen nuclear facilities open for international inspection, but eight will still be inaccessible (perhaps because they are still under construction?). Furthermore, even Rice acknowledged that suspected ties between India and Iran are cause for concern. Not that she considered them a reason to prevent the nuclear deal. On the contrary, Rice said that "the deal would improve energy security, by reducing India's reliance on fuel from Iran." Rather odd, considering that, just last month, US President Bush decided to approve of a pipeline going from Iran to India (see this article and note the flip-flopping — he he).

Anyway, much of all this is suspicion and mistrust — possibly unfounded. India would clearly benefit from the energy that can be provided by nuclear power plants. The question is simply to what extent a country should prove itself, and how supportive it should be of international disarmament initiatives, before other countries begin supporting its nuclear efforts.

Actually, the question is also what, exactly, motivated the American government to come to this agreement. Was it a wish to "'deepen strategic partnerships'" or a wish to ease pressure on diminishing oil supplies? Was it financial interests? A desire to quell "'all the hostility and suspicion of the past'"? A benevolent concern for the well-being of Indian citizens? A recognition of Asia's growing importance on a global level? A wish to help the environment by reducing carbon emissions? . . . I wonder to what extent official explanations reflect the truth.


Note: All quoted text and much of the information is taken from this BBC article. Except when enclosed in both single and double quotation marks, all quotations were written or paraphrased by the BBC, not directly quoted.

Another Note: See this article for further (better) analysis of the matter.

Final Note: I would have posted this yesterday, but I ended up sleeping for about twenty hours. :o)

Thursday, April 06, 2006

Intermezzo

Ah, the joy of pompous titles and misused words . . .

I haven't finished my next serious post yet, but I want to post something before I finally go to sleep, so here is a short, pointless post.

First, three limericks:

There was once a man in Berlin
Who drank a whole bottle of gin.
So tipsy was he
That he chortled with glee
And danced jigs in the streets of Berlin.

There once lived an affable flea
Who liked drinking milk with hot tea.
When he once drank too much,
His reaction was such
That it killed the unfortunate flea.

There were once three ducks in a pond
Who of each other were exceedingly fond
'Till one day a bread crumb
Caused them all to become
The most bellicose rivals du monde.

Unfortunately, I have not yet mastered the art.

Now for a photo:

Snowscape

It was taken from the second floor of our house in the (early) morning after a light snowfall. The colours really were like that — blue, white and black.

The snow was interesting because it came unusually late in the year, and it fell in large flakes, rather like small feathers. I don't remember ever having seen snowflakes so big. But then, the weather in general was odd during that time (in mid-March). In the space of a week or two, there was sun, rain, snow, hail, and lightning (which came very close to our house). Pretty exciting at the time . . . :o)


Note: The as-yet half-finished post will come later today, along with a few others (if all goes well).

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Part Three: Final Flight

The final part of my cross Canada flight, and perhaps the longest:
"General passengers to the front." With that I stood up, hurriedly stuffing my still unfinished sudoku puzzle into my pocket and entered the plane. I sat down behind the wing again, but closer to the back. The plane itself was the same model; 737, I think, and the interior, and exterior, were near identical. As I look out of the window, for I have a window seat once again, I can see the little people, zooming about the boeing sized parking.
I hear an engine, ours? Either way, I hope there will be an in-flight meal this time, as already stated I don't care about the movie. An announcement, you must excuse me... to Tawato!
Up in the cloudless sky, the Calgary sub-urbs and sky line gone once again. Above are clouds, but I can't see any below. note: here I apperently stopped writing, but the plane has gone either over the clouds or has reached lower ones.
I can bearly see a road, a still sandy expanse, as I look through my window through heavy clouds, of which, as I stated, I can see, as if through a screen, not a break in the clouds, the country below. I expect a snack soon, which may calm my stomach, but for now: chatter, clouds and the sky.
...awaiting snacks...finished snacks...past fluffy clouds, now flying over a clear sky, looking down at clumps of tiny pools, looking like a well insect-tunneled tree. A while ago I had passed a very big river, but now I can only see an ice-covered lake and the a-fore mentioned clumps of pools. Roads and fields, tiny spots of water, and the occasional river, the one below me being covered in a layer of ice, and little mountain-like rises flank the river and carve out a valley after the river ends and winding on below me. The river, and tributaries attached, are dotted with little lakes. Tiny, fluffy clouds are dotted over the sky, settling to a long strip of clouds going to the horizon, and then turning into a smooth, thin, fog like expanse. Fields going to the horizon, a little village below, I think I can even see the white covers on hay bundles in a field. The insect-hole-like pools I had mentioned are once more visible, if more scattered.
...more icey lakes... another dry river-valley, same as the first, is now visible to me and, though thinner than the last, meets water once again and continues it's winding way to the horizon.
...more ice lakes, smaller now, and is that a small river? Running too. Another river, the ice reaching only so far and the rest; valley. Do you get a feeling of deja vu? Because I do. I'll write if I see something new. (in other words, not ice lakes.) :-)
The land looks greener, but not much, and still no end in sight. I hope reading this isn't as dull as it seems to me. If you have lost interest, I don't blame you, but otherwise, I'm sure the scene will change soon. Also you should consider that I'm writing of the scenery of half of Canada, a description of which could be much longer than my few post.
We're turning, and it must be for a reason. Spots of more sandy-white scenery are appearing and now engulf the land. In short, it looks like a desert. Grids are appearing, clearly man-made, and they look like roads. But why would there be roads in the middle of nowhere? Well, as I find out later, what looks like desert sand is really just yellowish snow, and the roads are to get to little farm houses, that looked to me like trees at first. Needless to say, the farms would be rather un-productive with all the snow. As to the amount of farms; hundreds, as far a my eyes can see.
The snow makes way for a green-gray expanse. I'll leave off for a while to rest my tired hands, my thump in particular which, by my strange way of holding a pencil, bears the brunt of my work.
Perhaps the dullest country of all, gray is now dominant, going as far as the eye can see. As to the land itself, still ice lakes, insect-holes pools, a field or two and the occasional largish lake in the background. Finally, there is one huge, icey lake below. Another right beside it is now visible, that is attached, in turn, to a truly gigantic lake a bit further off.
A strip of pink and orange is appearing in the horizon, a thin, grayish cloud-field is to be seen near it. I'll break now for another snack.
As orange dissapears from the strip of colour, the sky, everything, darkens. Fluffy clouds are seen below, and the plane's outside lights come on. By now the strip of pink, too, is going, and with it my ability to distinguish plane wing from ground. Or cloud, I don't know. As I look out again, even the sky is turning to the colour of the land below; black. Now only the planes outside lights are visible without, and within most lights, too, have been turned off, following an announcement in English and, right after, french. A muscle in my thump is somewhat strained, so I'll take another brake. Also, in my complaining style, I'll add that my ear is once more annoying.
I will take this time to describe the bathroom. Namely, that it is the size of a closet, has actual tissue papers for cleaning hands, and at the push of a button the toilet flushes with a mighty roar. In short, I prefer the one we have at home. (At least four times bigger, I'm betting on six.)
Anyway, as a change of topic, outside, other than the planes lights, a blinking red one rythmically illuminates pat of the wing and then disappears, it is totally black outside. The monotony truly puts the cloud cover from my first flight into perspective. Compared to this it seems quite lively.
Down and down goes the plane. No, nothings wrong or exiting, unless you count the fact hat my tale is nearly at it's end. On go the landing lights, at first I thought it was thunder, and inside the general lighting has returned. I may have to halt any moment now, landing procedures, so I might as well leave you for now, leaving you to ponder my annoying ears. :-) note: I can see the wings! No, we haven't flown through the night, it is simply the fog reflecting city, plane and airport lights. More changing pressure and a lighted city below. The runway is now visible below, and traffic. Actually, this isn't really a note. The following is however: it later turns out that what I thought was the runway was just a major road. For noises I hear mainly rumblings.
Some blue lighting, shops I think, and we have just landed, I myself completely ignoring normal procedures and keeping on with my log, (I'll make it up to them in the return flight), with a mighty roar. Finally, settling down, our flight at an end; the last announcement, (will it be followed in French? Yes!) and we're done. Or are we? We were at a stop on the taxi way, twenty minutes early. The crew told a joke to keep us amused, (unfairly enough, not followed in French) and then the pilot informed us that due to our quick arrival, a plane is in our gate. note: in Calgary we were fifteen minutes late. So we wait.
The plane is filled with a 'new car smell', despite the lack of cars. Well, we're off again, and we now wait for the crowd in the plane to thin. Noises, a waiting crowd, more noises, little people outside, more noises...my thumb :-) ... out we go.
After walking through the airport building, we now await the baggage. It so happens that the baggage carosel has soon started, but no luggage, let alone ours, in sight. The first baggage comes, and ours soon after. I must break now.
...at the car rental counter...crunching numbers...done! Now through an open air lot and into our near-fully automated car, which has a sickish scent of fake berry smell, no doubt an air freshner, and we're on the open road to Knotings (Tnokings). The sky is slightly light due to the fog, but I can still see little but what is illuminated by car lights.
North, West, South, West again, South, West once more and South into Knotings. The rest of the day is groceries and bed, so I'll leave it off. Well, there you have my day of flying, waiting, and driving. I hope my narrative wasn't too dull, and I will not write down my stay or return to Wary Ave. See you next post, (if there is one), Gnomey

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Part Two: First Flight

I embark now on the second part of my journey. For those who have not seen the first, look for the last post. I forgot to add earlier that this is taken from a log I'm keeping of my trip, so it may switch from past tense to present tense. My apologies. Anyway, the plane has arrived, I now await to board. The former passengers stream out of the plane, into the airport and past my seat. I'm somewhat relieved; the few newspaper articles, the funnies and sudoku didn't fully eliminate my mixed sense of boredom and impatience, a nasty mix but common with me.
When the last passengers passed by, the disabled and children under eleven were called to the ticket desk and started off, then the 'general borders', including me, my mother and my father, came to the front and were soon walking, in the fresh, drizzling rain, to the waiting plane, which, I having entered it and finding a window seat, soon began to grumble, as if not wanting to take off. The pilot gave a little speach, and the plane's noises started to calm. Then all the other strange noises bagan: gurgles, wiping noises, engine noises... Another plane has just set off, and I await a similar fate.
I have a good seat, behind the wing and rather near the back. I looked out, observing the 'little people' moving about, normally zooming about the airport in their tiny vehicles. A new noise, as if our plane were getting ready to taxi... Another speach, a woman this time, giving a warning on electronics, all the while talking very fast, only to be followed by a French voice, taking a calmer pace. Then the pilot again, ("cross checks complete"). Finally, introductions.
I was shortly cut off, having to stow away my log for take off, and will give a brief review: Sure enough, the new noise mentioned above was our plane's engine, and the plane turned to the taxi way, which was covered with strips of newer asphalt which gave it a graffiti effect. An over-sharp turn later and the plane was on the runway, both it and I facing our demons; a long flight and, for me exclusively, annoyance of the ears caused by change of pressure, or annoying ears for short.
With a rise in pressure, in speed, in noise and in height, we took off. I enjoyed a brief view of cars, houses, roads and grass, true symbols of Victoria, before flying into, and over, the clouds. As I hadn't eaten breakfast, I, for once, looked forward to the in-flight meal, and, as I had guessed, my ears are causing me some annoyance. Here come the snacks. Anyway, a bit later I saw a spot of land covered in road, and, a little later still, the first snow-and-stone covered mountain, standing above the water and in front of a layer of clouds. We have now reached a second layer of cloud, a thinner and more scattered layer. looking down, under the second layer and through patches in the first, I see more mountains, same as the first. I think I can say as a fact: "Amazing view."

I pause from eating two cookies and coke, (no dipping), to look outside; the clouds have settled to a dull monotony. No, that's unfair, for the occasional clear patch hints at the world below, namely mountains, plenty of snow covered mountains. These are the proud, similar-looking, Snow covered and rocky coast mountains. I will pause from the poetic writing above to state: "Alright, now it's monotony!"
White as paper, and as flat. Up to now, and for quite a while longer, this is what the clouds will be, and the air is a blanket-like-blue. The only thing breaking the monotony is the plane; The wing outside, a calm-yet-noisy inside, filled with the noise of chatting and crinkling paper. What I'd do without the plane I don't know, fall, I guess. Either way, annoying ears, hunger, and being bored at the monotony, all these would be the least of my worries.
By the way, as the monotony is not what I expected, I fear the highlights of the flight will be the movie, in-flight meal and landing. Another, quiet announcement, this may be the most you hear of my flight. Oh well, clouds can't go on forever, can they? note: There will be no movie, (I don't care), or in-flight meal, (I do care). There will, however, be a landing. :-) Finally, the clouds will certainly not go on forever.
Speaking of which, the monotony is broken! Mountains, yes more of them, can be seen through a silk-like cloud, and even those now fall away to reveal the Rockies; white-capped stone, constant rivers, both looking as though they had never been touched.
The plane had just met with some turbulence, but as the pilot gave a related warning it stopped. The plane then turned to reveal long strips of mountains going to the horizon. A few clouds wandered over the mountains, fluffy, scattered and small, but they quickly fell away with the snow, revealing a sandy-yellow coloured land. As we fly over the remainder of the Rockies, our current destination drawing near, I have to lay down my log for a short while, drawing you a last discription of annoying ears, prairies, (or, at least, foot hills), gray-brown forests and the occasional golf course. Wait, also sandy, grided minor roads, a large major road, a river, and the first view of asphalt roads, cars and what look like houses. As the plane turns, the wing reveals some multi-coloured wiring.

A normal landing and a few announcements later, the plane was filled with the sound of clicking seatbelts, the sound of bags being picked up or, in the case of overhead compartments... picked down? Also, a rise in chatter and people, including me.
As I near the end of a long post, I don't want to forget the following: As the plane taxied to the parking, the wings tended to sag from weight and be pushed about by the wind, if only on a tiny scale. Now this is only to be expected from a mass of metal, wiring and fuel jutting out over the air, and the plane can handle it well, and the flexibility may even improve the plane, still, it seems uncomfortable. Anyway, once again we are waiting in the waiting room, and I remember the sudoku I had saved from before, which I will finish, hopefully... So ends my second narrative. The third will follow after a good long break.

Flying Across Canada

...And I'm off, heading around Trapsan Road bend, the car taking an all to familiar (to me) route to the airport.
As you may have noticed, I write little on this blog, this post is to counter that. The post will be about my journey across Canada. I will try to keep with facts, but if I wonder to feelings, my apologies. Also, most names are alliterations.
I am on this trip to help with a move, mine and my family's, to Eastern Canada. I am also, however, planning to get aquainted to my new home. I will have two days of flying and three days at Tnokings.
After driving along Chinwasesta, right into Smitvach and left into Snatechsia we reached the Airport and the long-term parking. We then headed down a sidewalk to the main building, the suit case's wheels making methodical thumps as they reached a new paving slab. Then, after sending off our larger luggage we headed to the metal detector and passed it. (With the all too common situation caused by steel toed shoes). We had entered the waiting room, where we sat down and waited. The constant chatter gave a rather pleasing atmosphere, contrary to my expectations, and, with the help of an article or two, the funnies and a sudoku puzzle time nearly flew by. As my post is getting rather long, I will keep this as an individual segment. The next part will deal with my first flight.

Yet More Photos

I have been writing rather a lot about politics lately. Since I intended there to be plenty of variety in this blog, I will look for a non-politics item later today. Here, in the meantime, are some more photos.

First, a Japanese cherry tree that grows near the gate:

Japanese Cherry

I like the colours — the dark red of the tree's leaves and the brick, the green of the hedge, the black and gold of the lantern, the white of the fence . . .

This next one is a photo of my alto recorder:

Recorder Music

It is made of wood and sounds lovely — much better, in my opinion, than a flute or soprano recorder. I would link to an audio clip, but it's too much bother. You will just have to trust me. :o)

The recorder and the sheet music (a suite by Telemann) are on our old upright piano. The piano is a little battered, but that is to be expected when there are five children in the household. Besides, the piano really is very old (from the turn of the century or thereabouts).

Finally, here are the neighbours' turkeys (nice and plump, eh?):

Turkeys

DeLay's Resignation

It seems that Republican Congressman Tom DeLay will leave Congress by mid-June, although he says he has done nothing wrong.

According to a CBC article, this is his reasoning:
"In an interview with The Galveston County Daily News in Texas, DeLay said he decided to resign after polls showed him only slightly ahead of his Democratic opponent, former Rep. Nick Lampson, in his suburban Houston riding. Elections are late next fall.

'Even though I thought I could win, it was a little too risky,' DeLay told the Galveston paper."
"only slightly ahead"?? Considering that DeLay was indicted on charges related to laundering campaign funds, and considering that his ties to Jack Abramoff are being investigated, why would he still be ahead at all in the polls?

To be fair, it seems that nothing has been proven as yet. Still, DeLay's former chief of staff did confess to conspiracy, and the fact that DeLay is being investigated at all should set off some warning bells.

At least he resigned (for whatever reason). Ralph Goodale, on the other hand, refused to resign when — as Canadian Minister of Finance in December 2005 — he was accused of leaking income trust information. Later, in January 2006, he was re-elected by his Saskatchewan riding despite being investigated by the RCMP over the income trust affair. I defended him at the time, which is probably hypocritical of me. In my defense, there seems to be less evidence in Goodale's case. Furthermore, the accusations against Goodale appear more obviously politically motivated (coming just a month or so before the election).

Still, to avoid inconsistency, I will (temporarily) take back my earlier reaction to Goodale's re-election, and to his refusal to resign. In my opinion, politicians must have the trust of the people (not just the support of their own constituents). More importantly, they must have respect for the processes that are in place to prevent corruption, even when they feel unjustly attacked by political opponents.

Monday, April 03, 2006

Italian Politics and Fireside Chats

There will be elections in Italy on April 9, and, according to a BBC article, it seems there is rather a lot of cynicism and discontent among the Italian people.

An excerpt from the article:
"'It's always the same faces,' [explains Martina Ricciardi, a 19 year-old law student]. 'Unless we get some new people, nothing is going to change.'

Talk to Italians long enough and this lack of options is one of the things that frustrates them the most.

While other concerns include the economy, jobs, and immigration, they are angered by the fact that there seems to be little chance of getting past the political point scoring that has hampered Italy's sporadic attempts at reform."
The candidates (quoted material taken from article):
Silvio Berlusconi - considered by many as "nothing more than a businessman who has failed to keep his promise of kick-starting the economy, lined his pockets at the country's expense and continually said the wrong things at the wrong time"

Romano Prodi - considered by many as "the economics professor without a political party who failed to save his government from collapsing in 1998 and who also has been investigated for corruption"
Another excerpt:
"The two men head coalitions that contain parties on the fringes of the left and right wings, something that prompts talk of governmental weakness rather than a confidence they will be able to push through difficult, and unpopular, reforms."
This is why, as much as I dislike our present electoral system (first past the post), I don't advocate party list proportional representation. Of course the Italian political culture is different, so the situation there probably wouldn't be repeated here. Still, most agree that a system like Italy's does more to encourage than discourage ineffectiveness and instability.

The irony (lots of parties, little choice) is interesting. It is understandable, though. If the parties represent the Italian people accurately, they aren't likely to change much over time. It is when a particular segment of the population, or a particular movement, is exaggerated through the efforts of a large political party that change really happens. (Sometimes too much change.)

Really, the best system seems to be something in between the American system (two parties, little choice) and the Italian system (many parties, little choice). The German system, for example, seems eminently reasonable. Maybe I'm biased. :o)

Now for the fireside chat part, inspired by the same article.

It seems that the President of Lombardia, Roberto Formigoni, has an online radio station that "plays music, explains policies and gives listeners a chance to express their views on the state of Italy today." Franklin D. Roosevelt did something similar when he was president of the United States (hence the "fireside chat" reference).

I think it is an excellent idea. As Formigoni says, it is a matter of connecting with the people. Even if the politicians' interest in the views of listeners is feigned — even if it is all a cynical ploy — I think this sort of thing can increase citizens' interest in politics and make them more hopeful.

Bleach

I have developed a liking for the anime series, "Bleach." The first storyline, which I prefer to recent episodes, deals with the proverbial1 average teenager, who gains unusual powers when he comes across Rukia, a female death god (or shinigami). Death gods, mind you, aren't hellish creatures or anything like that. They look human, and are responsible for preserving the balance between the world of the living and the world of the dead.

A picture of Soul Society's shinigami captains ("Soul Society" being a spirit world, somewhat like heaven), taken from >>Shinigami<<:

Shinigami Captains

The main character, Ichigo, becomes acquainted with Rukia, who lost her powers when Ichigo gained his. Together, they battle "Hollows." These Hollows, which figure prominently in the first storyline, are the souls of deceased people who were not able to go to the world of the dead. They are empty creatures that "eat" human souls, and must be purified by shinigami.

When Rukia is arrested by people from Soul Society for transferring her powers to a human, Ichigo sets out with his friends to free her before she is executed.

A picture of Ichigo and Rukia from Mangaluxe:

Rukia and Ichigo

It doesn't seem particularly original as plots go, and there is rather more fighting than is pleasant, but I found the series very interesting as a whole. I've been able to learn more about Japanese culture, and can recognize several common words (soda/soka, hai, baka, taicho, etc.), although I don't know about the spelling. Another aspect that I appreciate is the wealth of characters, and the way their stories are told as the series progresses. Finally, I like how the series is not all about fighting or all about the comic relief, nor does it try to be unnecessarily deep. It is simply good entertainment, and a nice alternative to similar shows from the West.

If you are interested, you can find episodes online on YouTube. Just search for Bleach 1 through Bleach 73 or so.

The online episodes, by the way, are subtitled, for which I am thankful. Not only does it give you a bit of an ear for Japanese, but the voices also seem much more appropriate. Some time ago, after watching rather a lot of subtitled anime online, I watched some dubbed episodes on TV. It was terrible! No offense to those with American or Canadian accents (I have one, too), but it doesn't fit at all!


1 I use "proverbial" loosely. I like the word.

Constitutional Changes in Canada

Excerpts from a CBC article:
"Prime Minister Stephen Harper is willing to re-enter debate over the Constitution in order to address concerns across the country, he told CBC News as legislators prepare for Parliament to resume Monday."
"Ultimately, there will have to be constitutional changes," — Harper
"Harper said he would act not 'just to accommodate Quebec but also to accommodate demands we have from the West and from other parts of the country.'

The prime minister also said that any revisiting of the constitution would have to involve concerns from all of 'the population of Canada.'"
"Harper also told the CBC he will work to rectify questions of a fiscal imbalance between the federal and provincial levels.

'We're prepared to do what we can to address it,' he said.

'Now, the truth of the matter is the provinces don't all agree on the size of the problem, the nature of how that problem should be solved across the country.'"
My goodness! I posted this partly for the sheer vagueness of most of the article. I find the Canadian Consitution, and any changes to it, very interesting, but I can gather little from this article. I suppose more details will emerge in the coming months.

On a different note, the same article includes this quotation:
"'The Conservatives are turning out to be just as bad as the Liberals,' [NDP leader Jack Layton] told delegates at the NDP federal council meeting in Ottawa."
I admit that I have an unreasonable and unworthy prejudice when it comes to the NDP under Layton, but really! Of all the things to complain about! You wanted change; you got it.

At least there is little likelihood of another vote of no confidence. One can only have so many elections in three years . . .

I like it when the NDP sticks to providing respectful, responsible, and cooperative input about specific issues facing government. In the article, for example, Layton said that he "wants to see that issues such as parliamentary ethics and the environment are also given top priority." He also said that he "wanted to see a parliamentary debate on Canada's military role in Afghanistan" and that "his party would not be willing to see Harper's minority government change laws in areas such as same-sex marriage." That sort of thing I appreciate.

Anyway, I look forward to moving to Ontario later this year. I will be considerably closer to all these goings-on, and I might even get to visit Parliament or the Senate (or both!). I cling to the belief that visiting them would be exciting.

Note: I have decided that I like the long quotations. They are easier, and they have the exact statements made by people who are involved. Accordingly, there is a smaller likelihood of misinterpretation (of which I am frequently guilty).

Sunday, April 02, 2006

The Iraqi Prime Minister

Excerpts from an article on the BBC website:
"Figures within Iraq's majority Shia alliance have for the first time urged Ibrahim Jaafari to stand down as PM to help a national unity government form.

Key alliance politician Qassim Daoud made the call, saying it would help break the political deadlock.

Mr Jaafari, a Shia, is opposed by the minority Sunni and Kurdish blocks."
"A key aide to Mr Jaafari told Reuters news agency on Saturday the prime minister would not give in to the calls to resign."
"[Daoud] said: '[. . .] There is a current [within the alliance] that is calling on the prime minister to withdraw his nomination because the political process has reached a deadlock.'"
"Mr Jaafari was chosen by the ruling Shia-led bloc after it won December's election.

But Kurdish and Sunni Arab parties have rejected the nomination and have threatened to boycott a national unity government unless Mr Jaafari withdraws.

The delay in forming a government is thought to be partly responsible for fuelling the increasing sectarian violence which has struck Iraq since last month's bombing of a key Shia shrine at Samarra.

Other sources within the alliance said as many four of the blocs within the grouping wanted Mr Jaafari to stand down if he could not gain Sunni and Kurdish support.

'Daoud's call is supported by at least 60% of alliance members of parliament,' a senior alliance official told Reuters."
The idea that a politician with so little support would stay in office in a country with Iraq's history is disagreeable, to say the least.

I wonder what kind of a precedent there is for leaders with little popular support in modern democracies. I know that in Canada and in other countries with a parliamentary system, the governing party can be forced to call an election if it loses in a vote of no confidence. That is to say, the Canadian system doesn't seem to allow for people in Jaafari's position to stay in office. As for the US, Bush's approval ratings are certainly low, but (unless I am mistaken) he does still have the support of Congress and the Senate.

In the case of Iraq, stability is, of course, an important goal. Still, a stable government that doesn't represent the people, or even the people's representatives, is not a democratic government. Either way, I should think that any Iraqi government that doesn't please all three ethnic groups (at least to some extent) will always result in unrest, not stability.

US President Bush's reaction:
"This week senior Shia politicians said US ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, had told them President George W Bush 'doesn't want, doesn't support, doesn't accept' the retention of Mr Jaafari."
I marvel at the gall of Jaafari when he says that "the comments undermined Mr Bush's commitment to democracy in Iraq." What does he think democracy is?

Well, perhaps I have heard only one side of the affair.

Sidenote: Perhaps I should stop including lengthy quotations from articles. Being able to write accurate, concise summaries is an important skill to practice, after all. :o)

Update: "The White House has denied the US is backing away from Mr Jaafari." (from this BBC article) Do I interpret this correctly as a direct contradiction to a quotation shown earlier in this post? Didn't "senior Shia politicians" say that "US ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, had told them President George W Bush 'doesn't want, doesn't support, doesn't accept' the retention of Mr Jaafari"?

Well, if there was misquoting involved, I suppose that's what happens when a statement is filtered through three sources. Silly BBC. :o) (Ah, the joy of patronizing professionals from afar.)

If the US government is either flip-flopping (!!!) or tolerant of Jaafari as Prime Minister, I withdraw what approval I had of their reaction to the affair.

Finally, if I misinterpreted, my apologies.

More Photos

Since the last two posts have consisted only of writing, here are some photos to relieve the monotony a little.

The first photo depicts an old, broken VW Beetle that has been sitting at the end of our driveway for years. I think that, unlike most broken, rusting cars, this one manages to look picturesque. But, then, I am biased. :o)

Volkswagen

(Note: I think the quality is better if you click on the photo to see the actual size.)

These next two were taken on the campus of the University of British Columbia (in Vancouver). The buildings aren't what I would consider good-looking, but at least they are interesting.

This first one is the back of the Koerner Library. The front is entirely different — all glass.

Koerner Library

This second one is the Buchanan Tower. It is usually, in my opinion, a dreadful eyesore. When it has been raining, there are long dark streaks on the concrete under the windows and the building generally is a darker, dirtier grey. Considering how often it rains in Vancouver . . .

Buchanan Tower

Anyway, in the sun (and behind some trees), it doesn't look so bad, and I'm sure some people like it either way.

Islam and Inexperience

I have been wondering whether my view of Islam is unrealistically positive, and whether I am too defensive about it. I have also been worrying about the fact that I have next to no actual exposure to Muslims, so it is highly presumptuous of me to discuss the religion and its followers as if I knew them intimitely. It is even worse to judge those who speak ill of Islam, considering that many of them probably know more about it than I do.

I wish I did know a greater variety of people. Growing up in this part of British Columbia has the disadvantage that a large percentage of people are white and are either Christian or follow no religion in particular. I can't really speak or write with credibility about religious or racial issues considering my lack of experience.

Oh well. It's not as if I'll stop writing about religious and racial issues. I suppose my inexperience is just something to keep in mind — something that will hopefully change with time.

Condoleezza Rice's UK Visit

According to an article on the BBC website (several articles, actually), US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice recently paid north-western England (and Jack Straw, in particular) a two-day visit.

Although I do not agree with many actions and policies of the Bush administration, I did agree with some of what Rice said to reporters there.

For example, I approved of the following:
"Ms Rice said her meeting with local Muslim leaders had been 'stimulating and candid'.

She said they had discussed how conflicts could be better resolved through 'politics and debate than through conflict and violence'.

What had emerged, she said, was the view that 'There is no difference or conflict between Islamic values and democratic values.

'In fact people who practise Islamic faith live here in a great democracy, as participants in a great democracy, as they do in the United States, as they do in India, in Indonesia and other places around the world.'" — from the article
What Rice says may all be insincere, and the visit may be nothing more than political posturing (that is, it may have no actual effect on policy or attitudes). Still, I like that she talked with local Muslim leaders and spoke of Islam in a positive light. I also like that she said that the protesters (of which there were many) were exercising a democratic right, and were not out of order. If members of the US government always acted like this, they would probably have a better reputation (justified or not).

In case it isn't obvious, I don't think it is enough to seem tolerant and open. If the US government were more diplomatic, but actually had no respect for others' opinions, that clearly wouldn't be acceptable.

Speaking of which . . . Yes, I do think the US government and any other government in the world should listen to and respect the opinions of foreigners. We non-Americans don't have the right to dictate US policy, of course, but we may have thought-provoking things to say. Furthermore, we do have a stake in US policies. That's what comes with being a superpower; people care what you do and say, and they will have opinions. The responsibility that comes with power, etc.

Anyway, one trivial thing that bothered me about the article was in the following quotation:
"We have to recognise Guantanamo is there for a reason, because we captured people on battlefields... who were either plotting or planning or actively engaged in terrorist activities." — Condoleezza Rice
Leaving the whole Guantanamo issue aside, isn't the statement a little contradictory? People on battlefields tend to be called soldiers — soldiers who plot, plan, or actively engage in military activities — don't they? Where guerilla warfare and things of the sort are concerned, I should think that terms like "battlefield" don't apply. I suppose this is all part of the "new kind of warfare." I should get with the times. :o)

To be fair, I will mention that (judging from the ellipsis) part of the quotation was left out in the BBC article, so I may be taking things out of context.

One last little note: Interesting that the British don't seem to like putting periods in their abbreviations (e.g. Ms, Lt Col) . . .

Lemmings don't jump off cliffs!

I don't consider lemmings particularly cute as rodents go, but they can be comparatively interesting. Lemmings are most famous for their alleged tendency to commit mass suicide by jumping off cliffs when their numbers become too great. (I've heard that this myth originated with a Disney film, but that could be a myth too.)

In any case, this article discusses an alternate, more plausible, explanation for the dramatic population swings that really do occur.

First, the obligatory picture of a lemming (from the article):

Lemming

. . . and, for no particular reason, a picture of a much cuter baby squirrel (from this site):

Baby Squirrel

Now for the article (written October 31, 2003) . . . Here is an edited version:

"One of the oddest phenomena in the natural world - the sudden mass death of lemmings - has been resolved, according to a trio of European biologists.

Olivier Gilg of the University of Helsinki in Finland and colleagues publish their research in today's issue of the journal Science.

[. . .]

Lemming populations, [the researchers] say, surge spectacularly and fall just as quickly, thanks to the combined feasting of four predators: the stoat, arctic fox, snowy owl and a seabird called the long-tailed skua.

The researchers [. . .] found that the population of lemmings and their cousins, the vole, can explode by 100 or even 1,000 times their original size.

That, in turn, boosts the predator numbers, which become so numerous and gorge so much on the lemmings that the rodent numbers plummet dramatically. The next phase is that the lack of lemming drives down the predator numbers.

[. . .] what is interesting in this case is that, with the lemmings, the pattern is almost like clockwork. It is a four-year 'boom and bust' cycle whose key is the stoat, a specialist predator whose only source of food is the lemming. The three other predators are 'generalists' - they like to tuck into lemmings but also have alternative nutrition.

The statistical clue to understanding the cycle is stoat numbers, which take a delay of about a year before falling in response to a lemming crash. The 'generalist' predators are still affected by a fall in lemming numbers but their population decline takes longer to kick in because they can immediately find other food when the crash takes effect."

In short, the reason for the lemmings' dramatic population swings is that — under the right conditions — the lemmings multiply rapidly. Their abundance leads to more predators, who feast on the poor little rodents. Then, when the feasting has wiped out vast numbers of lemmings, many predators run out of food, and their numbers drop. Some time later, the cycle repeats.

It all seems rather dramatic and stressful. I think that, if I were a lemming, I would prefer more steady, balanced arrangements. :o)

Anyway, I will leave you with this picture (also from the article) of a stoat ("key to the boom bust cycle of lemmings"):

Stoat

A Brazilian in Space

According to a BBC article, Lt Col Marcos Pontes has become the first Brazilian to travel beyond the limits of Earth.

From the article:
"A Russian Soyuz rocket carrying the first Brazilian into space has docked with the International Space Station two days after lift-off from Baikonur.

Lt Col Marcos Pontes will spend nine days on board, while a Russian and a US colleague accompanying him will stay for six months.

Col Pontes took with him a Brazilian flag and a football shirt - to help his team in the World Cup, he said.

[. . .]

Millions in Brazil watched Thursday's launch, with every successful step for the rocket and Lt Col Pontes likely to be warmly received at home."
Isn't that nice? :o)

I was somewhat conflicted about the expense of space programs, actually. However, I have come to the conclusion that they are, at least, positive contributions. They make people happy, proud, curious, etc. Considering that the money probably wouldn't be spent for a better cause anyway, why not explore space?

This sort of thing is unfortunate, of course:
"The mission [. . .] comes less than three years after Brazil's space programme met with disaster when a rocket exploded on the launch pad.

The explosion of the first Brazilian rocket, built to take satellites into orbit, killed 21 people at the site in the north of the country."
On the other hand, one could argue that the people who were killed chose to take the risk, and they were (I hope) doing what they loved.

Daylight Saving Time

As most people in Canada and the U.S. hopefully know, Daylight Saving Time will start in a few hours (if it has not already begun). On that subject, then, here is part of an article on the CBC website:
"Daylight time traditionally sets in at 2 a.m. local times on the first Sunday in April. Clocks are turned back an hour the last Sunday in October.

However, beginning next year, daylight time will begin two weeks earlier and end one week later.

The United States is leading the move in a bid to save energy. Most of Canada will follow suit."

Yet, in the indepth article about Daylight Saving Time, it says:
"In July 2005, U.S. legislators voted to extend daylight time by one month in the spring and one month in the fall, so daylight time would start the first weekend in March and end the last weekend in November. Time experts predict scheduling chaos if Canada doesn't follow suit."
And, later on:
"U.S. President George W. Bush signed legislation in August 2005 calling for daylight time to start on the second Sunday in March, three weeks earlier than the traditional start. The bill also extends daylight time by a week to the first Sunday in November."
Well, which is it? Three weeks? Two weeks? One week? A month? Perhaps the legislation was amended. Several times. Or perhaps I have terrible reading comprehension.

Anyway, as the article says, some have debated the actual usefulness of the legislation when it comes to conserving energy. In my opinion, as long as people don't assume that all energy problems are now solved, I really don't mind either way. It is probable, however, that the changes will be costly. In that case, I hope that the Canadian and U.S. governments carefully weighed the ramifications (both positive and negative) before passing the legislation.

Edited to add: Incidentally, I find the phrase "time experts" in the second quotation rather amusing. :o)

Saturday, April 01, 2006

Photos

I've recently begun taking lots of photos with my brother's digital camera. What follows is a sampling.

First, some flowers in honour of spring:

Camelia

Rhododendron Bud

The first is a camelia, and the second is a rhododendron bud.

Now for some black and white photos . . . This first one is a photo of moss growing on a tree in our orchard.

Moss

This one is of a two-headed figurine. Beside it are a corn cob pipe and a coffee grinder.

Two-headed Figure

I don't claim to be a good photographer any more than I claim to be an artist. :o)

Headscarf Bans

Some old news:

Not quite two years ago, headscarves, skullcaps, crucifixes, and other conspicuous religious symbols were banned from public schools in France. A few months later, the German state of Bavaria became "the latest of the country's federal states to ban Muslim school teachers from wearing headscarves," according to a BBC article.

In the Bavarian case, it is only headscarves, not other religious clothing or symbols, that are banned. The same is true for the state of Hesse, where "the headscarf ban applies to all civil servants."

The reasoning (from the aforementioned article):
"The Bavarian parliament approved the measure after Culture Minister Monika Hohlmeier argued that the headscarf was a symbol of the repression of women. [. . .] Ms Hohlmeier said the headscarf had become a political symbol which was widely abused by Islamic fundamentalist groups and was not consistent with democracy, equality and tolerance."
Good work, people! Refuse teachers the right to wear what you deem symbols of repression and Islamic fundamentalism! Address repression with further repression . . .

It is probably unjust of me, but I can't help but think that — at least in the German cases — racism or misunderstanding is at work.

Hasn't Christianity been responsible for its share of repression, murder and intolerance? It seems to me that the only difference is that most people in Europe have many friends, acquaintances or even family members who are Christian. Accordingly, it is clear that any overly negative view of Christian symbols is unjustified.

With Islam, on the other hand, there is, I should think, not so much contact. As a result, there are people who think only of recent news stories and of the attention-grabbing behaviour of fundamentalist Muslims. In my opinion, consequent warped views are responsible for the belief that all will be better off if headscarves are banned.

In short, I think that the German state governments are not responding appropriately to what problems there are. It seems to me that the solution lies with education, understanding, empathy, and tolerance — not with banning headscarves.

In the French case, in particular, what of those girls who cannot attend public schools because they are forced to — or want to — wear a headscarf or veil? Is it a good idea to condemn them to home-schooling or private schools? Won't they be less exposed to other ways of life as a result? Won't it just lead to more ignorance and misunderstanding?

Anyway, I was a little curious about the following part of the article:
"[The federal Constitutional Court of Germany] said new laws could be passed by individual states banning [headscarves] if they were deemed to unduly influence pupils."
Were studies done about this? Were students interviewed? I would be curious to see the results (if there are any). I suppose I could look it up, but I'd rather not. Terrible of me, I know. :o)

Concerning Passports

From an article on the CBC website:
"In 2007, Canadians will be barred from entering the United States unless they have a passport or a U.S.-issued border-crossing card. The so-called 'laser visas' include biometric identifiers such as fingerprints or retinal scans."
Well, well, well. So we are not to be trusted any more? :o(

I don't actually mind it particularly, except that it might mean nasty paperwork for me. (boo!) That is, if it has to be a Canadian passport, which is probably not the case.

As for this:
"The U.S. president said he is committed to implementing the law as passed by Congress, but he hopes technology can create a single card that would meet the requirement." — also from the article
I'll stick to the passport, thank you. :o)

It's a little amusing that the last two times my family went to the US, we encountered the vast majority of our difficulties when we were trying to get back into Canada. Ze tables haff turned!!!

Solo Flight

Here are pictures of my brother's first solo flight. He is flying a Cessna two-seater — Cessna 152 or something of the sort.

This first one shows him taking off.

Solo Flight: Take-off

Here is a picture of him as a little speck in the sky beside the control tower:

Solo Flight: Control Tower

. . . at least I think that's him. :o)


Note: Photos taken by my tootly friend.